(23-06-2020, 01:06 PM)Jason W Wrote: Thank you for your illustration, however the R number is more important the greater the number of current cases - a high R number in a small number of total cases is easier to control by local lock downs whereas a low R number in a high number of total current cases is more difficult to control.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-52632369
The headline in the telegraph sums it up nicely
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/06...y-measure/
With that statement, we're in agreement. However, I would not hold truck with very much Ross Clark says. The R number is not something that is being plucked out of the sky, scientists calculate the R based upon short/medium term historical data that has been collated over previous weeks.
The ideal situation is to maintain an R of, preferably below, 1, the German figure of 2.88 is sufficiently high to cause concern. No government in their right mind would report an R of 2.88 unless they were convinced that it was accurate. It follows, that there will likely be a negative effect on their economy as well as bringing alarm to the population until they have the reproduction under control. Which it currently isn't.
Large increases in short periods, like we have had, will have little significant change on our R because of circumstance, the same would not necessarily apply however, if there were to be a general rise in infections with the advent of more tourists arriving. This, for sure, is something that the government is going to have to watch very closely. Stories I am hearing would suggest very much otherwise, sadly.