30-03-2020, 09:54 PM
(30-03-2020, 09:00 AM)Robbo Wrote:(25-03-2020, 12:17 PM)Ducks Wrote: ... but ultimately the safest course of action is to assume that it is loose in the population, and that anyone you interact with might have it.
Assume everyone you come into contact with is a carrier, and behave accordingly.
I have a bit of a problem with this. Despite all the stuff we've heard in the UK about compassion and unity, there's a more insidious line being peddled IMO; other people are an existential threat. Stay away from them. Don't interact with them, and minimise contact time if you have to interact. Get supplies before them. Their survival directly threatens yours...
Whether you view this as sensible advice or paranoia can be a fine line...
I understand your point, but the unfortunate reality is that people are a threat. 100% of all murders, assaults, robberies, and any other crime you can think of are caused by people. 100% of the spread of this virus has been caused by people. This is not paranoia. This is absolute and incontrovertible fact. People are a threat, and now more than ever.
Obviously at the beginning, this was nobody's fault. People were just trying to live their lives normally, unaware they were posing a threat to others, but in the last month or so it has become very clear that one person's actions can cause serious harm to themselves and their community, and people have still behaved stupidly, selfishly, and dangerously. People went to the pubs until they were thrown out, and in swarms to the parks until they were closed. People are still throwing house parties, refusing to respect the distancing rules in shops, and attending Events in every country that hasn't made this literally illegal. There are even people who refuse to accept that this virus is real and dangerous, and are insisting that it is a political hoax, or can be fought with herbal remedies, or only affects old people and foreigners.
You have no idea who is or isn't infected. Engaging with people puts you at risk, and potentially puts them at risk, too. Under normal circumstances, I'd say you can take whatever risks you want for yourself; generally, I believe every adult should be able to make that choice for himself. However, these are not normal circumstances, and people's choice to engage in risky behaviour affects everyone else: if you get the virus and insist on ignoring advice to maintain distance, it is not just you who will be affected. In 30 days, one person's infection can spread to 406 people. 406 people whose lives could be derailed or ended because 1 person didn't want to stay away from other people for a couple of weeks because it might look like paranoia or some kind of government meddling.
I don't care if the government is meddling, and I don't care if it seems like paranoia. Right now, people are a huge threat because of the behaviours they are choosing, so I choose to try to protect myself, my loved ones, and my community. I am doing my best to prevent the spread of this disease by maintaining distance from others outside my household. If you wish to take from this the message that other people's survival threatens yours, that's your choice, but my take is that other people's actions threaten your survival, which is something very different.
I can't change anyone else's actions, but I can change my own. This will increase my chances of survival— and help other people's chances, too. I would urge you and everyone to do the same.

![[-] [-]](https://fuerteventura.click/images/collapse.png)